Intel shows how AMD CPUs have a 10-second performance delay

Intel has substantiated its findiings with proofs but there's more to the story than what meets the eye.

In what seems to be an attempt at covering its dismal quarterly performances, Intel, in a recent embargoed presentation demonstrated that AMD’s flagship Zen 2 (Ryzen 4000) CPUs have a hidden 10 second performance delay to conserve power. Intel’s Chief Performance Strategist Ryan Shrout also highlighted on-battery versus off-battery discrepancies in AMD’s performance, this time with proper benchmarks. 

Intel’s engineering team uncovered the fact that the discrepancies between on-battery and off-battery performance isn’t visible in commonly used industry benchmarks, such as Cinebench, PassMark, or Geekbench. However, it clearly shows up in PCMark 10 Applications benchmark. 

Folks over at Ars Technica were also able to corroborate Intel’s findings with their own independent tests. 

“We were able to confirm Intel’s findings over the weekend, working with an Acer Swift 3 SF314-42 laptop (with a Ryzen 7 4700u CPU) and an MSI Prestige 14 Evo laptop (with a Core i7-1185G7).”

This resulted in Intel’s i7-1185G7 outperforming the 8-core/8-thread Ryzen 7 4700u in both single and quad-thread workloads. However, In the unlimited workload, where the Ryzen 7 is allowed to flex its full octa-core muscle, things are much closer. 

Intel clearly wants to lead people to conclude that AMD is gaming benchmarks and Intel’s Tiger Lake CPU is ahead of AMD’s flagship. However, that is not the whole picture. Intel’s report about the 10-second performance delay is obviously true, but it ignores the greater efficiency of the AMD systems, above and beyond the delayed shift to maximum performance (and battery consumption) states in the CPU. As Ars Technica states, 

“When we run Cinebench R23 for five full minutes, a Ryzen 7 Pro 4750u system renders more scenes than the Intel i7-1185G7, and it does so with less total power consumed. There’s no clever trick to explain that away.”

All said and done, the simple takeaway is this. If Intel’s Tiger Lake CPU doesn’t feel substantially faster than the Ryzen 4000, and it doesn’t, then there’s not much point in ramping up CPU power profiles that quickly. In fact, it is better to conserve battery, as AMD has done.   


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Hot Topics

Samsung Galaxy S20 series discontinued after failing to make expected impact upon launch

Last year, Samsung came out with its Samsung Galaxy S20 series but according to reports, it seems to have been discontinued. The trio wasn’t...

Is WhatsApp even safe anymore? Another privacy data violation reported

After severe backlash in response to Whatsapp’s new privacy policies, there is yet another report of data violation by Whatsapp. According to reports, mobile...

Removing unwanted objects in photos is easier now: Samsung Galaxy S21 ‘Object Eraser’ got you covered

Taking the perfect pictures is hard enough while editing and cropping out certain unwanted objects or people might be tiresome and time-consuming. However, a...

Related Articles

MediaTek unleashes 6nm Dimensity 1200 premium 5G chipset

Dimensity 1200 has already received TÜV Rheinland certification for its 5G performance, with tests covering 72 real-world scenarios.  The first devices with the...

ICEA seeks minimum base rate of 1.5% for electronics sector under RoDTEP

ICEA pointed out that products with higher demand for export must magnetize the best of RoDTEP rate based on the level domestic value...

Sony Xperia 10 III CAD renders leak online revealing design and camera setup

Last year, Sony released the Xperia 10 II, which proved to be a solid mid-range phone with decent specifications and an affordable price. Now,...